<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 586 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442964</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A) decision to delete additions for NPA provision and interest accrued but not realized, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal for the assessment year 2013-14. The Tribunal supported the assessee&#039;s adherence to NABARD guidelines for provision and mercantile system of accounting, finding no errors in the CIT(A) findings. The cross objection by the assessee aligned with the CIT(A) order, leading to no separate adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2023 14:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 586 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442964</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A) decision to delete additions for NPA provision and interest accrued but not realized, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal for the assessment year 2013-14. The Tribunal supported the assessee&#039;s adherence to NABARD guidelines for provision and mercantile system of accounting, finding no errors in the CIT(A) findings. The cross objection by the assessee aligned with the CIT(A) order, leading to no separate adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442964</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>