<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 308 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33969</link>
    <description>Duty was not payable on liquid chlorine lost during the unavoidable special filling process used to make the product marketable, because the loss occurred within the factory, was fully accounted for, and was not due to clandestine removal. The resulting sniff gas was treated as non-excisable waste, and remission was therefore required for the accounted loss. The assessee succeeded on the duty liability arising from process loss during filling, and the departmental challenge to the relief for the later period failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72597" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 308 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33969</link>
      <description>Duty was not payable on liquid chlorine lost during the unavoidable special filling process used to make the product marketable, because the loss occurred within the factory, was fully accounted for, and was not due to clandestine removal. The resulting sniff gas was treated as non-excisable waste, and remission was therefore required for the accounted loss. The assessee succeeded on the duty liability arising from process loss during filling, and the departmental challenge to the relief for the later period failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33969</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>