<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 572 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442950</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of service tax demand at Rs.96,80,867/- as per the Show Cause Notice, rejecting the higher amount confirmed by the adjudicating authority. The penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 was waived as the Appellant demonstrated no intention to evade tax and no suppression of facts. The demand for service tax with interest was upheld, while the penalty was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2023 08:58:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725947" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 572 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442950</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of service tax demand at Rs.96,80,867/- as per the Show Cause Notice, rejecting the higher amount confirmed by the adjudicating authority. The penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 was waived as the Appellant demonstrated no intention to evade tax and no suppression of facts. The demand for service tax with interest was upheld, while the penalty was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>