https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442941 The Tribunal set aside the demand against the appellants for paying royalty over what was declared and for the alleged shortage of MS Bars. The Tribunal found the evidence insufficient to support the claims of clandestine removal and shortage, referencing previous cases to emphasize the need for concrete evidence. Consequently, the demand for duty was deemed unsustainable, leading to the dismissal of penalties and allowing the appeals with consequential relief. en-us Wed, 23 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Sep 2023 08:57:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442941 The Tribunal set aside the demand against the appellants for paying royalty over what was declared and for the alleged shortage of MS Bars. The Tribunal found the evidence insufficient to support the claims of clandestine removal and shortage, referencing previous cases to emphasize the need for concrete evidence. Consequently, the demand for duty was deemed unsustainable, leading to the dismissal of penalties and allowing the appeals with consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 23 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442941