<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 169 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33965</link>
    <description>A 100% export oriented unit was entitled to Cenvat credit on High Speed Diesel Oil used for manufacturing operations and for generating electricity for captive consumption. The analysis treated supplies to EOUs as deemed exports under the relevant notifications and noted that those notifications specifically covered EOUs and fuel. Because the Revenue did not effectively dislodge the findings based on that notification scheme, it could not deny credit merely by characterising HSD as an inadmissible input under the Cenvat Credit Rules. The credit was therefore available to the assessee and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 169 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33965</link>
      <description>A 100% export oriented unit was entitled to Cenvat credit on High Speed Diesel Oil used for manufacturing operations and for generating electricity for captive consumption. The analysis treated supplies to EOUs as deemed exports under the relevant notifications and noted that those notifications specifically covered EOUs and fuel. Because the Revenue did not effectively dislodge the findings based on that notification scheme, it could not deny credit merely by characterising HSD as an inadmissible input under the Cenvat Credit Rules. The credit was therefore available to the assessee and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>