https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309616 Section 34(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is confined to an adjournment of setting-aside proceedings so the arbitral tribunal may eliminate grounds for challenge; it does not authorise a court to remand the award for a fresh decision on all issues. The tribunal retains discretion to decide whether to act and what steps are needed to cure the defect, including any procedural prejudice. A remand for de novo reconsideration was therefore inconsistent with Section 34(4), and the order was modified to a limited adjournment-oriented course. en-us Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Sep 2023 14:11:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309616 Section 34(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is confined to an adjournment of setting-aside proceedings so the arbitral tribunal may eliminate grounds for challenge; it does not authorise a court to remand the award for a fresh decision on all issues. The tribunal retains discretion to decide whether to act and what steps are needed to cure the defect, including any procedural prejudice. A remand for de novo reconsideration was therefore inconsistent with Section 34(4), and the order was modified to a limited adjournment-oriented course. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309616