https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309610 In execution of a decree for specific performance, a third party in possession of vacant land under registered sale deeds was treated as dispossessed when court delivery of possession caused loss of control over the property, so an application under Order XXI Rule 99 CPC was maintainable. The amended execution scheme was read as a complete code requiring the executing court itself to decide all questions of right, title and interest under Order XXI Rules 99 and 101, rather than driving the objector to a separate suit. The objectors' appeal succeeded, the contrary view was set aside, and the matter was remanded for decision on merits. en-us Wed, 19 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Sep 2023 11:37:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309610 In execution of a decree for specific performance, a third party in possession of vacant land under registered sale deeds was treated as dispossessed when court delivery of possession caused loss of control over the property, so an application under Order XXI Rule 99 CPC was maintainable. The amended execution scheme was read as a complete code requiring the executing court itself to decide all questions of right, title and interest under Order XXI Rules 99 and 101, rather than driving the objector to a separate suit. The objectors' appeal succeeded, the contrary view was set aside, and the matter was remanded for decision on merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 19 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309610