<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 647 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309610</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s dismissal of the Objectors&#039; application under Order 21 Rule 99, remanding the case for a fresh decision. Emphasizing efficient dispute resolution, the Court allowed the Objectors&#039; appeal, directing the High Court to re-examine the merits, including the parties&#039; knowledge of the prior agreement of sale. The Decree Holder&#039;s Special Leave Petition was rejected, with costs to follow the High Court&#039;s final decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2023 11:37:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 647 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309610</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s dismissal of the Objectors&#039; application under Order 21 Rule 99, remanding the case for a fresh decision. Emphasizing efficient dispute resolution, the Court allowed the Objectors&#039; appeal, directing the High Court to re-examine the merits, including the parties&#039; knowledge of the prior agreement of sale. The Decree Holder&#039;s Special Leave Petition was rejected, with costs to follow the High Court&#039;s final decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>