<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 559 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442937</link>
    <description>In a CGST prosecution, regular bail was granted where investigation had been completed, the complaint had been filed, and co-accused had already obtained bail. Parity was treated as a relevant consideration, and the Court noted that continued custody would serve no useful purpose when the matter was to proceed to trial. The prayer was allowed without expressing any view on the merits, subject to the specified conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2025 12:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 559 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442937</link>
      <description>In a CGST prosecution, regular bail was granted where investigation had been completed, the complaint had been filed, and co-accused had already obtained bail. Parity was treated as a relevant consideration, and the Court noted that continued custody would serve no useful purpose when the matter was to proceed to trial. The prayer was allowed without expressing any view on the merits, subject to the specified conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>