<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 545 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442923</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, noting the AO&#039;s failure to substantiate the non-discharge of onus by the assessee. The Tribunal found no fault in the CIT(A)&#039;s order, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. The cross-objection by the assessee was also dismissed as a result.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2023 12:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725859" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 545 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442923</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, noting the AO&#039;s failure to substantiate the non-discharge of onus by the assessee. The Tribunal found no fault in the CIT(A)&#039;s order, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. The cross-objection by the assessee was also dismissed as a result.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>