<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 157 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33954</link>
    <description>Service tax on Maintenance and Repair Services for the period before 16.06.2005 was found to fall outside the amended definition said to cover the applicant&#039;s services. An earlier final order on an identical issue for a prior period was treated as directly applicable to the stay request. On that basis, waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery of the disputed demand was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72582" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 157 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33954</link>
      <description>Service tax on Maintenance and Repair Services for the period before 16.06.2005 was found to fall outside the amended definition said to cover the applicant&#039;s services. An earlier final order on an identical issue for a prior period was treated as directly applicable to the stay request. On that basis, waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery of the disputed demand was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>