https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309606 Continued suspension was treated as a fact-specific administrative measure, not one requiring automatic revocation merely because a charge sheet had not yet been filed. The Delhi HC considered the seriousness of the corruption allegations, the ongoing CBI and PMLA investigations, the employee's senior position, and the possibility of influencing witnesses or evidence, and found these factors sufficient to justify continuation. The petitioner's non-disclosure of material facts was also viewed adversely. On that basis, no interference with the suspension order was warranted and the writ petition failed. en-us Fri, 05 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Sep 2023 22:28:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309606 Continued suspension was treated as a fact-specific administrative measure, not one requiring automatic revocation merely because a charge sheet had not yet been filed. The Delhi HC considered the seriousness of the corruption allegations, the ongoing CBI and PMLA investigations, the employee's senior position, and the possibility of influencing witnesses or evidence, and found these factors sufficient to justify continuation. The petitioner's non-disclosure of material facts was also viewed adversely. On that basis, no interference with the suspension order was warranted and the writ petition failed. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 05 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309606