https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309593 A suspension following detention in a criminal case attracted deemed suspension under Rule 10(2) of the CCS (CCA) Rules, and its continuation beyond 90 days was upheld under Rule 10(6) because the department retained discretion to assess the gravity of allegations and administrative necessity. The Tribunal held that Ajay Kumar Choudhary did not create an automatic lapse of suspension after 90 days in every case, particularly where arrest by CBI and pending factual developments could affect departmental action. It declined to interfere with the suspension or its extension, but directed the respondents to decide the applicant's representation within four weeks. en-us Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Sep 2023 22:28:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309593 A suspension following detention in a criminal case attracted deemed suspension under Rule 10(2) of the CCS (CCA) Rules, and its continuation beyond 90 days was upheld under Rule 10(6) because the department retained discretion to assess the gravity of allegations and administrative necessity. The Tribunal held that Ajay Kumar Choudhary did not create an automatic lapse of suspension after 90 days in every case, particularly where arrest by CBI and pending factual developments could affect departmental action. It declined to interfere with the suspension or its extension, but directed the respondents to decide the applicant's representation within four weeks. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309593