<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 187 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33952</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, rejected Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Commissioner&#039;s order allowing Cenvat credit of service tax. The Tribunal held that the procedural requirement for registration number on invoices was not fulfilled due to valid grounds of omission during the implementation of rules for input service distributor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 17:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 187 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33952</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, rejected Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Commissioner&#039;s order allowing Cenvat credit of service tax. The Tribunal held that the procedural requirement for registration number on invoices was not fulfilled due to valid grounds of omission during the implementation of rules for input service distributor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>