<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Invalidates Penalty Notice u/s 271(1)(c) Due to Lack of Clarity and Procedural Errors.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71958</link>
    <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice - not striking off irrelevant matter - If without being sure as to what was the basis on which he was planning to impose the penalty on assessee, such a notice, in our view, would indicate non-application of mind and the notice would be not valid. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2023 18:13:40 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2023 18:13:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Invalidates Penalty Notice u/s 271(1)(c) Due to Lack of Clarity and Procedural Errors.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71958</link>
      <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice - not striking off irrelevant matter - If without being sure as to what was the basis on which he was planning to impose the penalty on assessee, such a notice, in our view, would indicate non-application of mind and the notice would be not valid. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2023 18:13:40 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>