<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 716 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309591</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to exclude interest on sticky loans transferred to a suspense account from taxable income if not realized for three years, in accordance with the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in UCO Bank Vs. CIT and a relevant CBDT circular. The Tribunal emphasized that the issue of interest accrual on sticky loans is debatable and cannot be resolved under section 154 of the Act, meant for rectifying apparent mistakes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2023 15:04:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725779" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 716 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309591</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to exclude interest on sticky loans transferred to a suspense account from taxable income if not realized for three years, in accordance with the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in UCO Bank Vs. CIT and a relevant CBDT circular. The Tribunal emphasized that the issue of interest accrual on sticky loans is debatable and cannot be resolved under section 154 of the Act, meant for rectifying apparent mistakes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>