<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 505 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442883</link>
    <description>The HC allowed the writ petition challenging a penalty order under GST Act. The court found the penalty under Section 129(1)(b) unjustified, given the petitioner possessed valid documentation proving ownership of goods in transit. The HC directed reconsideration of the penalty under Section 129(1)(a) and granted the petitioner liberty to pursue additional legal remedies against the assessment order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2025 13:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725756" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 505 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442883</link>
      <description>The HC allowed the writ petition challenging a penalty order under GST Act. The court found the penalty under Section 129(1)(b) unjustified, given the petitioner possessed valid documentation proving ownership of goods in transit. The HC directed reconsideration of the penalty under Section 129(1)(a) and granted the petitioner liberty to pursue additional legal remedies against the assessment order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>