<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 122 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33947</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi allowed the appeal, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to reject a refund claim for service tax on mobile phones. The Tribunal held that service tax credit is permissible unless it can be proven that the mobile phone use was unrelated to business activities. As no such evidence was presented, the Tribunal set aside the previous order and granted the appeal. (2009 (2) TMI 122 - CESTAT, New Delhi)</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 18:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 122 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33947</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi allowed the appeal, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to reject a refund claim for service tax on mobile phones. The Tribunal held that service tax credit is permissible unless it can be proven that the mobile phone use was unrelated to business activities. As no such evidence was presented, the Tribunal set aside the previous order and granted the appeal. (2009 (2) TMI 122 - CESTAT, New Delhi)</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>