<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 465 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442843</link>
    <description>Import of old and used worn clothing without the required licence justified confiscation under Customs law, and the existing redemption fine and penalty were found adequate. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s request for enhancement because no legal infirmity or disproportionality was shown in the adjudicating authority&#039;s order. The confiscatory and penal consequences were therefore left unchanged, and the impugned order was affirmed in full.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2023 09:24:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 465 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442843</link>
      <description>Import of old and used worn clothing without the required licence justified confiscation under Customs law, and the existing redemption fine and penalty were found adequate. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s request for enhancement because no legal infirmity or disproportionality was shown in the adjudicating authority&#039;s order. The confiscatory and penal consequences were therefore left unchanged, and the impugned order was affirmed in full.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442843</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>