<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 102 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33943</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the petitioners to prosecute their appeal, which was dismissed for failure to deposit the required amount. The petitioners were directed to deposit an additional Rs. 15 lakhs within four weeks. Upon compliance, previous dismissal orders were set aside, and the appeal was restored for the Tribunal to hear on merits. Failure to comply would lead to dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 102 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33943</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the petitioners to prosecute their appeal, which was dismissed for failure to deposit the required amount. The petitioners were directed to deposit an additional Rs. 15 lakhs within four weeks. Upon compliance, previous dismissal orders were set aside, and the appeal was restored for the Tribunal to hear on merits. Failure to comply would lead to dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>