<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 454 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442832</link>
    <description>Service tax liability on works contract services for laying railway tracks and allied support structures for specified public sector and industrial recipients turned on whether the activity qualified for exclusion/exemption relating to &quot;railways.&quot; Relying on Tribunal precedent, it was held that the Finance Act, 1994 did not restrict the railways-related exclusion/exemption only to Government railways, and the adjudicating authority could not import a restrictive definition from the Railways Act, 1989 to deny the benefit. The legislative intent of exclusion prior to 01.07.2012 and exemption thereafter was found clear. Consequently, the assessee was held entitled to exemption under Notif. No. 17/2005-ST for the period prior to 01.07.2012 and under Notif. No. 25/2012-ST post 01.07.2012; the impugned demand was set aside and the appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 14:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 454 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442832</link>
      <description>Service tax liability on works contract services for laying railway tracks and allied support structures for specified public sector and industrial recipients turned on whether the activity qualified for exclusion/exemption relating to &quot;railways.&quot; Relying on Tribunal precedent, it was held that the Finance Act, 1994 did not restrict the railways-related exclusion/exemption only to Government railways, and the adjudicating authority could not import a restrictive definition from the Railways Act, 1989 to deny the benefit. The legislative intent of exclusion prior to 01.07.2012 and exemption thereafter was found clear. Consequently, the assessee was held entitled to exemption under Notif. No. 17/2005-ST for the period prior to 01.07.2012 and under Notif. No. 25/2012-ST post 01.07.2012; the impugned demand was set aside and the appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>