<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 450 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442828</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the matter for re-determining the classification and valuation of 27 products in Appeals E/21481/2014 and E/21712/2014. The Tribunal upheld the demand for 14 products in Appeal E/20158/2019, remanding the matter to re-quantify the demand and re-examine the classification and valuation of the remaining 27 products. The Commissioner was directed to reconsider the evidence on suppression and other factors for invoking the proviso to Section 11A.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2023 09:23:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 450 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442828</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the matter for re-determining the classification and valuation of 27 products in Appeals E/21481/2014 and E/21712/2014. The Tribunal upheld the demand for 14 products in Appeal E/20158/2019, remanding the matter to re-quantify the demand and re-examine the classification and valuation of the remaining 27 products. The Commissioner was directed to reconsider the evidence on suppression and other factors for invoking the proviso to Section 11A.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>