<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 18 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33941</link>
    <description>The court set aside the interest levied under Sections 234B and 234C of the IT Act for assessment years 1991-92 and 1992-93. The petitioner, a minor during the relevant years, filed returns voluntarily but faced interest charges. The court found the petitioner&#039;s reasons for non-payment genuine due to family circumstances and voluntary tax payments. Emphasizing the discretionary nature of waiver, the court ruled in favor of the petitioner, declaring them not liable for interest but denying a refund. The respondent&#039;s failure to consider circumstances and exercise discretion led to the judgment in favor of the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 18 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33941</link>
      <description>The court set aside the interest levied under Sections 234B and 234C of the IT Act for assessment years 1991-92 and 1992-93. The petitioner, a minor during the relevant years, filed returns voluntarily but faced interest charges. The court found the petitioner&#039;s reasons for non-payment genuine due to family circumstances and voluntary tax payments. Emphasizing the discretionary nature of waiver, the court ruled in favor of the petitioner, declaring them not liable for interest but denying a refund. The respondent&#039;s failure to consider circumstances and exercise discretion led to the judgment in favor of the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33941</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>