https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442821 The appeal challenged the acquittal of the respondent for an offense under Section 138 of the N.I. Act. The court found that the disputed cheque was rightly treated as a "security cheque" and that the complainant failed to prove the existence of a legally enforceable debt within the limitation period. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and the bailable warrant issued against the respondent was canceled. en-us Tue, 06 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Sep 2023 22:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442821 The appeal challenged the acquittal of the respondent for an offense under Section 138 of the N.I. Act. The court found that the disputed cheque was rightly treated as a "security cheque" and that the complainant failed to prove the existence of a legally enforceable debt within the limitation period. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and the bailable warrant issued against the respondent was canceled. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 06 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442821