https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309589 The High Court dismissed the writ petition under Article 226 for contractual disputes, emphasizing that such disputes rooted in private law and contractual obligations should be adjudicated outside the scope of Article 226 unless there is a significant public law element involved. The court found that the issues raised required factual determinations and interpretation of the contract, unsuitable for writ jurisdiction. Allegations of fraud lacked clear evidence, and financial inconvenience did not constitute irretrievable harm. The petitioner was directed to pursue alternative remedies in appropriate civil proceedings, and the status quo order regarding the retention of bank guarantees was extended for four weeks. en-us Fri, 12 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Sep 2023 22:38:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309589 The High Court dismissed the writ petition under Article 226 for contractual disputes, emphasizing that such disputes rooted in private law and contractual obligations should be adjudicated outside the scope of Article 226 unless there is a significant public law element involved. The court found that the issues raised required factual determinations and interpretation of the contract, unsuitable for writ jurisdiction. Allegations of fraud lacked clear evidence, and financial inconvenience did not constitute irretrievable harm. The petitioner was directed to pursue alternative remedies in appropriate civil proceedings, and the status quo order regarding the retention of bank guarantees was extended for four weeks. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 12 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309589