<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1556 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309585</link>
    <description>The court quashed and set aside the impugned assessment order dated 7th February, 2020, for the assessment year 2006-07, due to the failure of Respondent No.1 to provide the petitioner, an eligible assessee, with a draft assessment order as required under Section 144C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural requirements to protect the interests of eligible assessees and ensure a fair assessment process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2023 22:38:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1556 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309585</link>
      <description>The court quashed and set aside the impugned assessment order dated 7th February, 2020, for the assessment year 2006-07, due to the failure of Respondent No.1 to provide the petitioner, an eligible assessee, with a draft assessment order as required under Section 144C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural requirements to protect the interests of eligible assessees and ensure a fair assessment process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>