<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 1200 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309587</link>
    <description>Withdrawal of an appeal to avail an amnesty scheme did not justify restoration when the scheme conditions were not satisfied. On the facts and the terms of the scheme, refusal to restore the appeal was supported by valid reasons, and no basis for appellate interference was shown. The challenge to the restoration order therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2023 22:38:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 1200 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309587</link>
      <description>Withdrawal of an appeal to avail an amnesty scheme did not justify restoration when the scheme conditions were not satisfied. On the facts and the terms of the scheme, refusal to restore the appeal was supported by valid reasons, and no basis for appellate interference was shown. The challenge to the restoration order therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>