<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 901 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309579</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs.28,92,750/- made by the Assessing Officer was upheld. The Tribunal found that the amount in question, related to an agreement for the sale of land, was never acted upon, unsigned, and the property remained in the assessee&#039;s name. Due to the lack of corroborating evidence and proof of possession being handed over, the Tribunal concluded that no taxable income arose from the unsigned document. As a result, the appeal was dismissed for the absence of any substantial question of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:50:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 901 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309579</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs.28,92,750/- made by the Assessing Officer was upheld. The Tribunal found that the amount in question, related to an agreement for the sale of land, was never acted upon, unsigned, and the property remained in the assessee&#039;s name. Due to the lack of corroborating evidence and proof of possession being handed over, the Tribunal concluded that no taxable income arose from the unsigned document. As a result, the appeal was dismissed for the absence of any substantial question of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>