<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (9) TMI 383 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309574</link>
    <description>For Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, a post-dated cheque is treated as drawn on the date it is delivered to the payee, not on the future date it bears, for computing the six-month presentation period. The presumption under Section 118(b) as to the date of an instrument operates only until the contrary is shown, and it does not apply where the cheque is shown to be post-dated or antedated. On that basis, presentation beyond six months from delivery was time-barred, and the complaint was liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2023 15:31:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (9) TMI 383 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309574</link>
      <description>For Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, a post-dated cheque is treated as drawn on the date it is delivered to the payee, not on the future date it bears, for computing the six-month presentation period. The presumption under Section 118(b) as to the date of an instrument operates only until the contrary is shown, and it does not apply where the cheque is shown to be post-dated or antedated. On that basis, presentation beyond six months from delivery was time-barred, and the complaint was liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309574</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>