<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1399 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309568</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty order under section 271(1)(c) due to the setting aside of the assessment order by the ITAT. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, allowing the Assessing Officer to consider initiating penalty proceedings afresh while completing the assessment. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of an alive assessment order for penalty consideration and found no reason to interfere with the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2023 11:17:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1399 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309568</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty order under section 271(1)(c) due to the setting aside of the assessment order by the ITAT. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, allowing the Assessing Officer to consider initiating penalty proceedings afresh while completing the assessment. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of an alive assessment order for penalty consideration and found no reason to interfere with the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>