<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 13 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33935</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of allowing credit for gate passes endorsed after 1.4.1994 but issued before that date, under Entry No.10 of Notification No.16/94-CE(NT). The court held that the requirement was for gate passes to be issued before 1.4.1994, not endorsed by that date. This decision aligned with interpretations by other High Courts and a circular by the Central Board of Excise &amp;amp; Customs, confirming the validity of endorsements made post-1.4.1994 for Modvat credit eligibility until 30.6.1994.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 13 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33935</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of allowing credit for gate passes endorsed after 1.4.1994 but issued before that date, under Entry No.10 of Notification No.16/94-CE(NT). The court held that the requirement was for gate passes to be issued before 1.4.1994, not endorsed by that date. This decision aligned with interpretations by other High Courts and a circular by the Central Board of Excise &amp;amp; Customs, confirming the validity of endorsements made post-1.4.1994 for Modvat credit eligibility until 30.6.1994.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33935</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>