<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 100 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33931</link>
    <description>The Court held that no appeal lies against the rejection of an application for renewal under the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 2004, emphasizing the distinction between new license grants and renewal processes. Regarding the right to a hearing and principles of natural justice, the Court set aside the order rejecting renewal due to the lack of a hearing and non-application of mind by the Commissioner, stressing the importance of procedural fairness and granting the petitioner an opportunity for a hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 100 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33931</link>
      <description>The Court held that no appeal lies against the rejection of an application for renewal under the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 2004, emphasizing the distinction between new license grants and renewal processes. Regarding the right to a hearing and principles of natural justice, the Court set aside the order rejecting renewal due to the lack of a hearing and non-application of mind by the Commissioner, stressing the importance of procedural fairness and granting the petitioner an opportunity for a hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>