https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309556 Where the parties had agreed a specific arbitral appointment procedure under the arbitration clause and the ICADR Rules, a unilateral appointment made outside that mechanism was invalid and could not bar recourse to the court under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Supreme Court held that such a non-conforming appointment was non est, so the petition under Section 11(6) remained maintainable and the court could secure constitution of the tribunal in accordance with the agreed procedure. en-us Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Sep 2023 09:39:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309556 Where the parties had agreed a specific arbitral appointment procedure under the arbitration clause and the ICADR Rules, a unilateral appointment made outside that mechanism was invalid and could not bar recourse to the court under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Supreme Court held that such a non-conforming appointment was non est, so the petition under Section 11(6) remained maintainable and the court could secure constitution of the tribunal in accordance with the agreed procedure. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309556