<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 213 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33927</link>
    <description>The Court held that the Director could not be personally liable for the company&#039;s sales tax arrears as the company was not yet wound up, rendering Section 18 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, inapplicable. The Court found the notices demanding payment from the Director to be illegal, arbitrary, and whimsical, quashing them and ordering the respondents to pay costs of Rs. 10,000 for issuing the notices without statutory provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 18:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 213 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33927</link>
      <description>The Court held that the Director could not be personally liable for the company&#039;s sales tax arrears as the company was not yet wound up, rendering Section 18 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, inapplicable. The Court found the notices demanding payment from the Director to be illegal, arbitrary, and whimsical, quashing them and ordering the respondents to pay costs of Rs. 10,000 for issuing the notices without statutory provision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>