<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 12 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33925</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging show cause notices under the Customs Act, emphasizing that courts should not interfere at this stage and petitioners should utilize statutory remedies. The petitioners&#039; argument of limitation was rejected due to their delay tactics. Allegations of fraud involving fake DEPB licenses were noted, with the court deferring judgment on the fraud issue for further investigation. The petitioners were directed to respond to the notices within four weeks. The court ruled against quashing the notices, allowing the respondents to proceed lawfully. The petitions were dismissed without costs, and related petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 12:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72553" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 12 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33925</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging show cause notices under the Customs Act, emphasizing that courts should not interfere at this stage and petitioners should utilize statutory remedies. The petitioners&#039; argument of limitation was rejected due to their delay tactics. Allegations of fraud involving fake DEPB licenses were noted, with the court deferring judgment on the fraud issue for further investigation. The petitioners were directed to respond to the notices within four weeks. The court ruled against quashing the notices, allowing the respondents to proceed lawfully. The petitions were dismissed without costs, and related petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>