<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 363 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442741</link>
    <description>A pledge of dematerialised shares may, consistently with Section 176 of the Indian Contract Act and the depository framework, include additional contractual incidents such as voting rights and limited ownership-like powers, so long as mandatory statutory requirements are not violated. The Court also treated assignment of the pledged shares under the SARFAESI regime as lawful and effective, holding that the assignee stepped into the bank&#039;s shoes and could enforce the security as pledgee. Allegations of fraud were held not to establish a prima facie case of voidness; at most they suggested voidability, which had not been properly avoided. Interim restraint on voting, transfer and participation in management was therefore refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2023 22:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 363 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442741</link>
      <description>A pledge of dematerialised shares may, consistently with Section 176 of the Indian Contract Act and the depository framework, include additional contractual incidents such as voting rights and limited ownership-like powers, so long as mandatory statutory requirements are not violated. The Court also treated assignment of the pledged shares under the SARFAESI regime as lawful and effective, holding that the assignee stepped into the bank&#039;s shoes and could enforce the security as pledgee. Allegations of fraud were held not to establish a prima facie case of voidness; at most they suggested voidability, which had not been properly avoided. Interim restraint on voting, transfer and participation in management was therefore refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>