https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442735 The appellant appealed against the freezing of bank accounts following the rejection of a request to unfreeze them. The appellant had already deposited a portion of the demanded amount, and freezing the accounts hindered business operations. The court found that the department failed to justify the freezing and did not provide alternatives for the appellant to conduct business. As a result, the order denying the request to unfreeze the accounts was set aside, and the appeal was allowed. en-us Wed, 23 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Sep 2023 09:36:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442735 The appellant appealed against the freezing of bank accounts following the rejection of a request to unfreeze them. The appellant had already deposited a portion of the demanded amount, and freezing the accounts hindered business operations. The court found that the department failed to justify the freezing and did not provide alternatives for the appellant to conduct business. As a result, the order denying the request to unfreeze the accounts was set aside, and the appeal was allowed. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 23 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442735