<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 354 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442732</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that if goods have not undergone manufacture, the credit availed is not valid. The matter was remanded for verification of credit availed on three products. Recovery of credit on non-manufactured goods was deemed unnecessary based on legal precedents. The original authority was directed to verify credit details and limit any recovery to the excess credit availed on the procurement of the three products.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2023 15:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 354 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442732</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that if goods have not undergone manufacture, the credit availed is not valid. The matter was remanded for verification of credit availed on three products. Recovery of credit on non-manufactured goods was deemed unnecessary based on legal precedents. The original authority was directed to verify credit details and limit any recovery to the excess credit availed on the procurement of the three products.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442732</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>