<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 10 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33921</link>
    <description>The High Court held that plastic droppers used in the manufacturing of Pediatric drops qualify as an input under the Modvat Scheme. The Court referenced relevant case law and ruled in favor of the manufacturers, allowing the credit of duty paid on the droppers. The decision aligned with the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of the Central Excise Rules, supporting the inclusion of plastic droppers as part of the manufacturing process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 10 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33921</link>
      <description>The High Court held that plastic droppers used in the manufacturing of Pediatric drops qualify as an input under the Modvat Scheme. The Court referenced relevant case law and ruled in favor of the manufacturers, allowing the credit of duty paid on the droppers. The decision aligned with the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of the Central Excise Rules, supporting the inclusion of plastic droppers as part of the manufacturing process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>