https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309554 In a SARFAESI auction context, the Court noted that no further extension of time was warranted where the appellant had already been given repeated opportunities to deposit the amount and had still failed to comply with the peremptory deadline. It also clarified that, under Section 17(2)(xii) read with Section 89(4) of the Registration Act, 1908, the authorised officer must hand over the duly validated sale certificate to the auction purchaser and forward a copy to the registering authority for filing in Book I. The broader requirement of the bank processing registration and stamp duty was rejected. en-us Tue, 05 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Sep 2023 22:19:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309554 In a SARFAESI auction context, the Court noted that no further extension of time was warranted where the appellant had already been given repeated opportunities to deposit the amount and had still failed to comply with the peremptory deadline. It also clarified that, under Section 17(2)(xii) read with Section 89(4) of the Registration Act, 1908, the authorised officer must hand over the duly validated sale certificate to the auction purchaser and forward a copy to the registering authority for filing in Book I. The broader requirement of the bank processing registration and stamp duty was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 05 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309554