<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 310 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33919</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the rejection of the declared value and its enhancement was not in accordance with the law. The authorities did not provide sufficient grounds to doubt the genuineness of the declared value. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside, reaffirming the importance of adhering to the legal provisions governing the acceptance of transaction value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 310 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33919</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the rejection of the declared value and its enhancement was not in accordance with the law. The authorities did not provide sufficient grounds to doubt the genuineness of the declared value. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside, reaffirming the importance of adhering to the legal provisions governing the acceptance of transaction value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>