https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309540 The amended Article 226 was interpreted as limiting writ relief only where an alternative remedy is adequate, efficacious, convenient and beneficial; a writ remains available where the impugned action is without jurisdiction or the alternative remedy is not real. The High Court's interim-order power continues, but is controlled by Article 226(4) to (6), which require notice, restrict ex parte relief, and bar interim orders in specified public-interest categories. Section 58 of the Forty-second Amendment Act does not govern pending appeals from finally decided writ petitions, and the High Court may entertain a petition on the constitutional validity of a Central law, though it cannot itself decide that validity. These restrictions apply to all Article 226 petitions. en-us Mon, 25 Apr 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Sep 2023 17:49:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309540 The amended Article 226 was interpreted as limiting writ relief only where an alternative remedy is adequate, efficacious, convenient and beneficial; a writ remains available where the impugned action is without jurisdiction or the alternative remedy is not real. The High Court's interim-order power continues, but is controlled by Article 226(4) to (6), which require notice, restrict ex parte relief, and bar interim orders in specified public-interest categories. Section 58 of the Forty-second Amendment Act does not govern pending appeals from finally decided writ petitions, and the High Court may entertain a petition on the constitutional validity of a Central law, though it cannot itself decide that validity. These restrictions apply to all Article 226 petitions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 25 Apr 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309540