<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 341 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442719</link>
    <description>Tender cancellation was challenged on the ground that the bidder had not submitted the GST registration certificate. The Court noted that the tender was rejected for this non-submission and that a fresh tender had already been floated. On the admitted facts, it found no sufficient basis to interfere with the impugned order, and the cancellation was left undisturbed. The writ petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 11:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 341 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442719</link>
      <description>Tender cancellation was challenged on the ground that the bidder had not submitted the GST registration certificate. The Court noted that the tender was rejected for this non-submission and that a fresh tender had already been floated. On the admitted facts, it found no sufficient basis to interfere with the impugned order, and the cancellation was left undisturbed. The writ petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>