<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 340 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442718</link>
    <description>The material on record showed GST invoices and e-way bills, and the seized vehicle carried the declared goods. The Court found that the prosecution had not produced material showing forged documents or otherwise establishing the ingredients of the alleged Indian Penal Code offences. At this stage, the matter was treated as a possible GST compliance irregularity rather than a prima facie criminal case under the Penal Code, and anticipatory bail was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 11:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 340 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442718</link>
      <description>The material on record showed GST invoices and e-way bills, and the seized vehicle carried the declared goods. The Court found that the prosecution had not produced material showing forged documents or otherwise establishing the ingredients of the alleged Indian Penal Code offences. At this stage, the matter was treated as a possible GST compliance irregularity rather than a prima facie criminal case under the Penal Code, and anticipatory bail was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>