<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 326 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442704</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, quashing the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The penalty was invalidated due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to specify the exact nature of the default in the Show Cause Notice, violating the statutory mandate of Section 274(1) of the Act. Other grounds of appeal were not adjudicated as the penalty was quashed on jurisdictional grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2023 09:02:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725420" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 326 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442704</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, quashing the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The penalty was invalidated due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to specify the exact nature of the default in the Show Cause Notice, violating the statutory mandate of Section 274(1) of the Act. Other grounds of appeal were not adjudicated as the penalty was quashed on jurisdictional grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>