<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 308 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33914</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Revenue, concluding that the refund claim for excess duty paid on un-manufactured tobacco would result in unjust enrichment. The respondents failed to demonstrate that the excess duty paid had not been passed on to customers, leading to the decision that the refund would result in unjust enrichment. As a result, the Tribunal ordered the excess duty to be deposited in the Consumer Welfare Fund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72542" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 308 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33914</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Revenue, concluding that the refund claim for excess duty paid on un-manufactured tobacco would result in unjust enrichment. The respondents failed to demonstrate that the excess duty paid had not been passed on to customers, leading to the decision that the refund would result in unjust enrichment. As a result, the Tribunal ordered the excess duty to be deposited in the Consumer Welfare Fund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>