<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 312 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442690</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962, finding the Appellant liable for facilitating mis-declaration in the import of Chinese Batteries. However, the Tribunal discharged the Appellant from the penalty under Section 114AA as the show cause notice did not include a charge under this section, deeming its imposition as legally unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2023 22:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 312 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442690</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962, finding the Appellant liable for facilitating mis-declaration in the import of Chinese Batteries. However, the Tribunal discharged the Appellant from the penalty under Section 114AA as the show cause notice did not include a charge under this section, deeming its imposition as legally unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>