<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 310 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442688</link>
    <description>A sale certificate issued under the SARFAESI enforcement process does not by itself displace existing encumbrances when the certificate expressly records them; the purchaser takes the asset subject to those encumbrances unless they are lawfully discharged through the prescribed statutory procedure. The note also states that the registering authority cannot be compelled to remove attachment entries or treat the certificate as free from encumbrances without compliance with the security interest enforcement rules and the registration framework. On that basis, the writ remedy was regarded as unavailable in the form sought because the statutory process had not been properly followed and the relief would bypass known encumbrances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2023 09:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 310 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442688</link>
      <description>A sale certificate issued under the SARFAESI enforcement process does not by itself displace existing encumbrances when the certificate expressly records them; the purchaser takes the asset subject to those encumbrances unless they are lawfully discharged through the prescribed statutory procedure. The note also states that the registering authority cannot be compelled to remove attachment entries or treat the certificate as free from encumbrances without compliance with the security interest enforcement rules and the registration framework. On that basis, the writ remedy was regarded as unavailable in the form sought because the statutory process had not been properly followed and the relief would bypass known encumbrances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>