<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 302 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442680</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the order dropping the demand for service tax on collection charges retained by the respondent, engaged in electricity distribution for municipal tax collection. It held that the respondent, a statutory body, did not provide taxable services to the municipal committees. The Tribunal found that the tax collection activity did not fall under &#039;Business Auxiliary Service&#039; as the municipal committees were not engaged in business activities. Additionally, the services provided were exempted under Notification No. 13/2004-ST, leading to the respondent not being liable for any service tax on the collection charges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2023 09:01:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 302 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442680</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the order dropping the demand for service tax on collection charges retained by the respondent, engaged in electricity distribution for municipal tax collection. It held that the respondent, a statutory body, did not provide taxable services to the municipal committees. The Tribunal found that the tax collection activity did not fall under &#039;Business Auxiliary Service&#039; as the municipal committees were not engaged in business activities. Additionally, the services provided were exempted under Notification No. 13/2004-ST, leading to the respondent not being liable for any service tax on the collection charges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442680</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>