<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 282 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442660</link>
    <description>An assessment order was found vulnerable because it ignored the C-Forms and F-Forms produced by the assessee, gave no reasons for rejecting that material, and did not reflect compliance with earlier directions to properly identify the disputed turnover. On that basis, the order was treated as suffering from patent non-application of mind and was set aside, with fresh assessment directed after considering all materials on record. The consequential bank account attachment, which depended entirely on the assessment demand, also lacked an independent basis once the assessment was quashed and was therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2023 09:00:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 282 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442660</link>
      <description>An assessment order was found vulnerable because it ignored the C-Forms and F-Forms produced by the assessee, gave no reasons for rejecting that material, and did not reflect compliance with earlier directions to properly identify the disputed turnover. On that basis, the order was treated as suffering from patent non-application of mind and was set aside, with fresh assessment directed after considering all materials on record. The consequential bank account attachment, which depended entirely on the assessment demand, also lacked an independent basis once the assessment was quashed and was therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>