https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309521 The court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, incorporating fraud allegations related to the Pledge Agreement. The court acknowledged the plaintiff's ownership claim over pledged shares and the fraudulent nature of the transaction, emphasizing the need to address the real controversy. Despite defendants' concerns, the court found no prejudice, allowing the plaintiff to proceed with the amendments to serve justice. The interim application was disposed of without costs, directing the plaintiff to make necessary amendments within two weeks. en-us Fri, 08 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Sep 2023 13:08:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309521 The court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, incorporating fraud allegations related to the Pledge Agreement. The court acknowledged the plaintiff's ownership claim over pledged shares and the fraudulent nature of the transaction, emphasizing the need to address the real controversy. Despite defendants' concerns, the court found no prejudice, allowing the plaintiff to proceed with the amendments to serve justice. The interim application was disposed of without costs, directing the plaintiff to make necessary amendments within two weeks. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 08 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309521